Are monthly subscribers worthless?

By Jack Marshall

Monthly subscriptions may be largely worthless for many publishers, FT Strategies argued last week. The subscription consultancy published an analysis of one of its client’s data and suggested that offering short-term subscriptions at aggressive discounts is not an effective way to maximize revenue in many instances. Publishers optimizing for revenue instead of simple subscriber volume would be better off pushing audiences to longer terms instead, it said.

The analysis sparked conversation among publishers. Some observers said the churn data in the case study seemed extreme compared with other benchmarks published by organizations such as INMA and technology vendors such as Piano. “Churn indeed makes annual contracts more valuable than monthly contracts, but monthly contracts are far from worthless, at least for most news brands,” argued INMA’s researcher-in-residence, Grzegorz Piechota.

Person walking down hallway quickly
A Media Operator logo

This story is free for you…

Create a free account to read this article and get our twice-weekly newsletter covering the media and events industry.

Or, subscribe to AMO Pro for full access to all reporting plus an invite to our exclusive AMO Slack community.
Person walking down hallway quickly
A Media Operator logo

Go Further with Unlimited Access

Become an AMO Pro member to unlock all of our reporting, join the exclusive AMO Slack community and get discounted tickets to AMO events.